Time for a complete ban on mass balloon releases?04/03/2009 14:57:59
National Association of Balloon Artists and Suppliers (NABAS)
Pop a balloon, save a dolphin NABAS, The Balloon Association has worked with the Marine Conservation Society to produce a strict code of conduct relating to mass balloon releases, which answers all of the issues raised by Mr Polkinghorn. We always recommend that a NABAS Member company is used to organise a balloon release as it is our policy that they should adhere to the following code of conduct for mass balloon releases: 1. Only natural latex balloons should be used (these will biodegrade harmlessly), Foil/Mylar balloons should NEVER be released. 2. The balloons should be hand tied (plastic valves should NEVER be used for a balloon release) 3. Only Helium/Balloon Gas should be used to inflate the balloons. 4. The balloons should NOT have ribbons or any other non bio-degradable material attached 5. The balloons should be released individually and never tied together. 6. Full approval should be obtained for releases of 5000 balloons or more from relevant authorities beforehand. 7. Balloons should be no larger than 12" and should be fully inflated (this ensures that they will rise to approx 5 miles and shatter into tiny pieces, therefore speeding up the biodegrading process) 8. All balloons sold near to a balloon release should be weighted so that they cannot be inadvertently released.
As you can see from our code of conduct above we take our environmental responsibilities very seriously and have worked hard to reduce any impact upon wildlife or the environment in general. As suggested in the article, to date there has been no conclusive proof that a balloon has caused the death of any sea animal and therefore we believe that it is somewhat irresponsible to campaign for what would potentially result in the loss of jobs and also funds for many charities. It must also be remembered that latex production for balloons requires many thousands of rubber trees which are extremely beneficial to the environment in general. We would suggest that it is better to work together to ensure that balloon releases are managed within the conditions of the code of conduct rather than launching a campaign to ban them altogether. For more information on The Balloon Association and our guidelines please go to www.nabas.co.uk By Steve Polkinghorne Wars are fought over oil, diamonds, water, gold, religion, pride, food, ....... and balloons! Because for the past few years there has been a war of words, between the multi-million dollar balloon industry and environmentalists. One side will tell you that balloons are great for making kids happy, making the sky look pretty, and increasing sales. The other will tell you that balloons are often mistaken for food by marine creatures, and that the ribbons used to tie them can become entangled in birds' beaks, and around the necks of birds and marine animals. Despite balloonaholics bombarding anybody who will listen with rather suspect evidence to the contrary, the facts suggest that balloons released into the environment really do pose a serious threat to wildlife - and any threat to wildlife today is a threat we could well do without, especially when it comes from something as utterly pointless as a balloon release. I am not suggesting that balloon lovers hide their booty under the floorboards, or that Earthies should go out and burn down their local Woolies. Oh, too late for that one ... Balloon science Latex balloons Mistaken for food by turtles Ribbons and other hazards Mass balloon releases Please help me by signing my petition (if you are a UK resident) and joining my MySpace campaign. Governments may be slow to act, but people can change things very quickly if they are given the facts and the incentive. Enjoy your balloons at home, responsibly, and dispose of them carefully. If you hear about a proposed mass balloon release, make your concerns known to the local authorities. We all like to have fun, but surely fun is funner when innocent creatures aren't killed as a result? My petition can be found here: Your details are visible only to the office of the Prime Minister. I desperately need more signatures before the petition has to come offline in June - the more people sign, the more politicians will take note and, perhaps, act. My MySpace campaign can be found here: Steve Polkinghorne
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Read the comments about this article and leave your own comment
Sadly you say "consenus" is pollution kills, but this is NOT fact, you have no scientific evidence.. You are merely saying what you think should be true. Less grandstanding and more facts rather than a knee jerk response would be more relevant.
Posted by: Ashley Evans | 19 Jan 2012 23:35:32
In direct response to Mr Bowler's comments, I have a statement from Gill Bell at the Marine Conservation Society <br />Prior to me starting working at MCS, there was discussion with NABAS over balloon releases. As an organisation we try to raise awareness of the impacts of balloons and where better to start than to contact the NABAS to made them aware of their actions. From this discussion, NABAS drew up their code of conduct and continue to infer we support their code. The fact that NABAS have a code which does limit the amount of potential damage balloon releases can do, may be down to discussion with MCS, however we do not support their code as it still advocates balloon releases - something they fail to mention in their claim to have worked with MCS. I hope this clarifies our position and again you are welcome to contact me to discuss this matter. So it would appear that Mr Bowler of NABAS is confused about the collaboration with MCS, and of course has chosen to completely ignore the fact that balloons take much longer to degrade in water. The code is of course also voluntary, and does not apply to individuals. Let's be clear about this - NABAS is only concerned with making money, and Mr Bowler with saving his job. The overwhelming consensus of opinion is that balloon pollution kills and maims animals - a fact supported by dozens of the UK's top naturalists and environmentalists who have signed my petition. I am happy to provide Gill's personal email address to anyone who wishes to question this, or you can contact MCS from their website here: www.mcsuk.org/info Steve Polkinghorne
Posted by: | 23 Mar 2009 22:04:39