Some people just don’t know when to shut up. Japanese whalers ridiculous PR
13/01/2010 11:28:35
The nasty arrows are much more dangerous that explosive harpoons - Apparently. Photo credit Institute of Cetacean Research
Pollution all the fault of Sea Shepherd - Arrows much more dangerous than harpoons-ICR male themselves the laughing stock. January 2010. The so called The Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR) do themselves no favours with their extraordinary press releases. Sitting in an office some 15,000 miles away, Wildlife Extra does not claim to know exactly what happened in the recent collision between a Japanese whaling vessel and the Ady Gil, the Sea Shepherd vessel attempting to stop the whaling. There should be nothing funny about the whaling, or Sea Shepherds attempts to stop it, but ridiculous claims and assertions make the ICR a laughing stock. We did point out last year that the Sea Shepherd claims that captain Paul Watson's life was saved when a bullet was stopped by a badge he was wearing seemed "unlikely", but here are a selection of almost laughable claims by the ICR, all from 1 release. And we save the best until last.
Some examples
Willful pollution (With misspelling ED). A recent ICR press release claims that the Sea Shepherd Society "is wilfully polluting the Antarctic environment." Apparently "an oily substance thought to be fuel is leaking from the Ady Gil and continues to spread over the sea surface." - This is the same people who take a small fleet of vessels into the Antarctic every year, including a supply vessel that carries oil. The other ships of the fleet refuel at sea, a notoriously accident prone past time even when the waters are calm. Sea Shepherd claims that, at some risk to their own crew, the Bob Barker did indeed remove much of the fuel from the Ady Gil so as to avoid polluting the seas as much as possible.
 |
Why on earth didn't Sea Shepherd tow what was left of the Ady Gil some 2000 miles across some of the world's roughest seas? Photo credit the Institute of Cetacean Research. |
Abandoned the Ady Gil. The release then states that "The Bob Barker has left the scene abandoning the drifting Ady Gil by the early morning of December 8." (Seems a long time ago?) I am not a sea-faring man, but to tow a badly damaged trimaran from the Antarctic to a safe port does seem an improbable task. And if the ICR are that concerned, they do have the option of towing it themselves.Lethal-force weapons! In what seems a comedic complaint, the ICR claim that the recovered "various drifting objects including several bowgun arrows" from the sea near the Ady Gil. They further point out that "carrying and possession onboard of a lethal-force weapon makes one ponder whether they would hesitate or not to produce casualties." Let me just take a reality check, go and stick my head in the considerable piles of snow outside in an attempt to make sure I am not imagining this. Are these the same people that carry, and fire, 6-8 foot long (Our guess) explosive harpoons that are fired from large guns?
Wildlife Extra believes that Sea Shepherd may bend a rule or two, but ridiculous bleating like the above makes the ICR a laughing stock. And if anyone from ICR is reading this, -YOU NEED A NEW PR COMPANY!
Click here to read the full release.
Read the comments about this article and leave your own comment
These people are real arses, why would they steer into the Ady Gil and nearly decapitate or crush the crew down near the waterline of the SM 2 ? Run over people at Sea, much ?
Yea, they need a kick in the Arse, muckin' about like that, puttin' people's lives at risk. No excuse. No more Japan products for this guy, and no Japan vacation eitha !
These blokes in Jpn deserve what they get comin' to 'em.
Posted by: GMark Fuller | 16 Jan 2010 08:27:45
In my opinion what the Japanese whaler did to the Andy Gill was nothing short of attemted murder. Unless I am mistaken the Andy Gill was stationary or as near as when it was hit by the whaling ship. Instead of being critised Sea Shepherd should be given a medal for doing what is really the Australian governments job. The ICR wants to wake up to the fact that most people including a large proportion of Japanese citizens are against the Japanese so called scientific research program. To say the least the IRC is nit picking and wants to wake up to reality
Posted by: colin guest | 15 Jan 2010 21:26:39
Clearly these people have no morals to speak of.
The Japanese government sits an ddoes nothing to stop the slaughter of whales, and I suspect that the people who make the decisions are probably receiving bribes to let the whaling continue.
I suggest that we need to boycot all Japanese products - cars, electronics etc. If we can dent their export market the Japanese industries will soon put pressure on their government to do the decent thing - even if it is for the wrong reasons!
Posted by: Harry Bowden | 15 Jan 2010 14:20:40